Animalparty has suggested a clean up of the sub-section "Genetic genealogy" is necessary. Two other articles (List of suspected perpetrators of crimes identified with GEDmatch and CeCe Moore) duplicate the information here about Parabon solving cases with Genetic Genealogy. I suggest making a link from Parabon to List of suspected perpetrators of crimes identified with GEDmatch. I suppose this might run into trouble in the future if Parabon didn't use GEDmatch for some cases (There is also a sub-section "List of arrest or identifications made with FamilyTreeDna" in the article Family Tree DNA) and/or if Cece Moore left Parabon. Anybody any comments? SylviaStanley (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
The GEDMatch article has been closed to editing for the moment. It will be sorely out of date until it is released from this restriction. I think that just mentioning GEDMatch in the Parabon article is fine, but deferring Parabon's accomplishments to the GEDMatch article is problematic. Parabon's cases should be outlined in Parabon's article, whether or not they used GEDMatch. MLCOTW (talk) 00:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
