Talk:Paragon (diamond)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Proposal for content-based split

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

...to a new article called "The Paragon (diamond)". This would be essentially the second paragraph and cites from the current article. This assumes 1) that the term in paragraph 1 is an actual gemological term worthy of its own article; 2) that the diamond The Paragon is worthy of its own article. (I wouldn't know.) Doprendek (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

The first paragraph of the article is moved to Paragon though it serves as a disambiguation page. I have also moved the reference alongwith but a google search of the mentioned google book page does not reveal the term. The specific page number is not view-able so a grey zone exists. Even the internet in particular does not mention details of gemological term. But context wise there is a possibility of validity of the information and so I have retained it on that page. A separate page for the first paragraph is therefore irrelevant. I have also created and redirected The Paragon (diamond) to this article. Split label removed. Diptanshu^Talk 12:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The gemological term is found in multiple books as evident here. Diptanshu^Talk 13:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic