Talk:Parallel key
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Corrections needed
editThe first part is fine. The section on computing the key signature is totally irrelevant. The section on parallel chord hard to understand and simply wrong. Two chords are parallel if they have the same internal intervals, e.g. C and G. These sections should be removed. Marius63 (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Additional citations/Ref improve
editWhy, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Parallel chord (Relative)
editThe current wording of this will be extremely confusing for any readers from the U.S. I think it needs to be very clear that is derived from Hugo Riemann. In the U.S., a parallel chord would be triads that share the same tonic but have a different mode (P in neo-Riemannian theory). — Devin.chaloux (chat) 03:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Why and where is this section confusing? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
"In contrast, a major scale and a minor scale that have the same key signature (and therefore different tonics) are called relative keys" it should be C Major and a Minor.