Talk:Paraphrasing (computational linguistics)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paraphrasing (computational linguistics) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 February 2018 by reviewer L293D (talk · contribs).

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer review request

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I am a new editor on Wikipedia. I am done with an initial draft and would like to know of any improvements I could make to this article. Neonrights (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Neonrights: I'd say it's an excellent effort for a draft. My only concerns are about the level of jargon and undefined acronyms like LSTM and BLEU. Wikipedia articles need to be understandable to laypeople, not just to experts in the field. In keeping with MOS:LEAD, the lead paragraph isn't merely an introduction, but should serve as a concise overview of each section in the body. An additional sentence saying something about the important areas of research (generation, validation, etc.) would suffice. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've made a few small edits so that the first instance of each acronym is spelled out, followed by the acronym in parentheses. I hope that helps. nagualdesign 01:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

History

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There was a guy who had wife that was so sick one day she go to clinic and get help 41.122.0.223 (talk) 07:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic