Talk:Parasoft DTP

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

CodeCurmudgeon (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here.)

Proposed move

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I'm thinking we should move this page to "Parasoft DTP" which is the current name of this product. Then put in a redirect from the current page "Parasoft Concerto" to "Parasoft DTP". Thoughts? CodeCurmudgeon (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

DONE. CodeCurmudgeon (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

written like an advertisement

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this page contains many keywords without giving some sense, and with it becomes highly confusing to beginners, and nonesense to experts. as examples "internal intelligence engine", "DPB can be used with agile software development, extreme programming, ..". --ThurnerRupert (talk) 03:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I believe my edit has helped remedy this issue. Should we consider removing the maintenance template? ScalarKnight (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic