This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
One user, VincenzoCiochetti, has begun extensively rewriting the article, as he has done with other articles. Some the changes, such as more precision about the mobilization in 1914, are quite useful, However, many of the changes are simply changes of style, and some are not acceptable. For example, redoing the date formats (changing August 1, 1914 to 1 August 1914) is not necessary; either date format is acceptable, as long as they're consistent throughout the article. The article was begun with the Auugust 1 format, and should stay that way.
Before you make further major changes, please explain the reasons first for what you're doing on the talk page. Editing needs to be done by consensus. Thanks for your consideration. SiefkinDR (talk) 05:55, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
