Talk:Paris sewers

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled]

edit

This article seems more about the Paris Sewer than the Paris Sewer Museum. IMO, the topic 'Paris Sewer' deserves its own article, which can mention that the Sewer has a museum dedicated to it. Rick lightburn 00:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Exactly. And it's ambiguous: the article "Paris Sewer Museum" (i.e. a museum) in english points to the "Egouts de Paris" (just a sewer) in french and not to "Musée des égouts de Paris" (a museum - the article is not created yet, but already referenced in lists). Green fr (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've created a separate article for the museum: Paris Sewer Museum Rystheguy (talk) 12:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edited the part about fictional references to reflect the fact that the novel 'Le Phantôme de l'Opéra' by Gaston Leroux does not play in the sewers under Paris, it plays in the Catacombs underneath the Opera House, which are not part of the sewer system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.114.206.251 (talk) 12:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paris sewers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply