Talk:Park Sun-young (actress)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 24 October 2016

Requested move 24 October 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Please note I am not !voting in assessing the consensus, but looking through the lens of policy and discarding those with no valid rationale it's 2:0 against a move, and even a head count is 2:2. Clearly no consensus to move. Andrewa (talk) 07:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Park Sun-young (actress)Park Sun-young – The T-ara member is known as Hyomin, and the F(x) member is simply known as Luna. Also, I googled her name and the actress comes up for the most part. There is no need to distinguish her as "actress" in the article title. Tibbydibby (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 03:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Sawol: I personally would prefer for Bak Seon-yeong to be moved to Bak Seon-yeong (disambiguation) and have Park Sun-young (disambiguation) to redirect there instead. Tibbydibby (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Relisting comment: Neither the nom nor the supporters seem to have got it. WP:primarytopic reads in part highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term (my emphasis). It is quite complicated, with many scenarios possible, and this is one of the most involved I've seen, but the fact that other articles are under different names doesn't automatically make the base name available for this article. It still needs to pass the primary topic test, otherwise it needs disambiguation. See WP:SIMPLEDAB for an essay that tries to explain it all. Andrewa (talk) 03:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose – rationale is ill formed, doesn't address the present use of the target name. Dicklyon (talk) 05:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.