Talk:Parker Hale PDW

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

edit

I propose that Bushman IDW be merged into Parker Hale PDW. The Bushman IDW is unreferenced and has no sources apart of 2 links to US patents. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 01:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

For. Very similar, if not mostly the same design. Usually, merging into the article of whichever came first would appear prudent (this case, it seems to be the Bushman), but the forerunner in question didn't seem to have left the blueprint/patent phase, and there unfortunately seems to be nearly nothing else sourcing its existence, so fusing with the materialized Parker Hale is agreeable. 2601:5:C480:88E0:DAA2:5EFF:FE96:5BB8 (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)Reply