 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | Parker Vector was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 April 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Parker Pen Company. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
2007
edit"the most prestigious and collectible in the world". There's POV, then there's the really-stretching-it-kind-of-POV. Cmon, you can buy this pen at Staples... with a coupon. The most prestigious? Would anybody throw a fit if I reworded this? -Taco325i 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think that phrase is both Weaselly and NPOV. By all means please do. Fan-1967 02:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
External link
editI've removed links to parkerpens.net and Parkercollector.com (note:different URLs, but same site) in the external links section a couple of times. The main reason I removed them was because they had been previously spammed across many different articles by Algabatz (talk · contribs) (once even including both links to the same site). Additionally, the link was self-described as an unofficial fan-site, and, per WP:ELNO, these are to be avoided. I wanted to see what others thought about it. Thanks! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 15:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Parker 51
editClaiming that Parker 51 (in 1941) was made to macth Quink properties of dry (created in 1931) has no factual support, so I rephrased the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsergio (talk • contribs) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Merge proposal: Parker Vector to Parker Pen Company
editParker Vector doesn't seem to be independently notable, but would perhaps be worth a mention/redirect here. Boleyn (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Selling price of pen to manufacture
editWhole seller and retailer 117.211.145.216 (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
"Parker 100" just links to this page
editUnder the "See also" section, there's an entry for the Parker 100, but that link just redirects to the same "See also" section. Should this be removed? JimboMcGrimbo (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Revisions
editThe introduction of this article turned out to be incorrect. Although I've amended it, I'm not very good at coding and wish that more knowledgeable users would fix my citation. 5.151.189.241 (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- That Newhaven website is crowdsourced so we can't really depend on it. Also, it's better to edit the article in parts instead of reverting it entirely because there were instances of vandalism. Sir Tragedy (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)