Talk:Parliamentary inquiries by the Belgian Federal Parliament
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Maarten Hermans in topic Copyright violation?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Translation.
editI see that the headings are written in English, but for some reason, the text is in (I presume), Flemish. Does anyone know why this is ? Surely, on the English Wikipedia, the whole article should be written in English.
RASAM (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- The passages in Dutch are the formal titles of the inqueries, and should ofcource be incorporated in English paragraphs explaining the inquiry, but I haven't found the time yet--its somewhere on my todo-list for 2008 :-) maarten (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation?
editI've removed the text for now because I'm not sure it's in the public domain of GFDL. Can someone please provide proof that it complies with Wikipedia's copyright requirements, before reverting back to the English only version? -- Jeandré, 2008-04-18t11:03z
- It is a list (non-creative work), of the official Dutch names of the inquiries (facts, non-creative work; explained in the paragraph above), published by a governement entity (public info) and interspersed with translations by User:Martijn_Hoekstra and burgeoning descriptions (creative work by Wikipedia). Please, do err on the other side if you are doubting if you should delete info; otherwise you give a casual Wikipedia-contributor all lot of frustrations. Cheers, maarten (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)