Talk:Part One (album)

Latest comment: 1 day ago by SafariScribe in topic Requested move 4 September 2024

Requested move 4 September 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. General consensus to move to Part One (album) per WP:NOTPT and WP:ALBUMDAB. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Part OnePart One (The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band album) – Pageviews shows here that the album is not even close to being the primary usage. The current target should be retargeted to Part 1. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Frost 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Relisting comment: consensus for move. Relisting to determine if it should move to Part One (The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band album) or Part One (album). Frost 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
A bit confused by this relist - WP:ALBUMDAB is a well-established naming convention, and nobody has specifically expressed a desire to keep the unnecessary disambiguation of the OP's proposed title. 162 etc. (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hang on, there is Part I: John Shade, Your Fortune's Made and things with subtitles are usually ambiguous with the base title. As with Talk:Liverpool 1 (TV series)#Requested move 28 July 2024 I would have concerns about "One" and "1" being indistinguishable and note that I am a supporter of SMALLDETAILS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm not aware of any sources that refer to the Fol Chen album by the abbreviated title "Part One". Hatnote is fine. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I agree that all 4 sources in the article don't use the title without the subtitle but I would keep in mind about people now knowing it has a subtitle unless its a title that could not be reasonably be referred to without the subtitle, see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)#Does this apply to subtitles?. When it comes down to qualifiers it generally pays to be unambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.