Talk:Part of Me (TV series)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

UNCERTAIN CAST

edit

Watchers of telenovelas should know that the cast is very uncertain when early announcements are made of telenovelas. In fact you can't even be sure that the telenovela will really be produced. Karla Monroig seems very doubtful as a protag of a telenovela. It is hard for me to believe that TM will actually do a refrito of its own ECDD this soon after its production with Lorena Rojas. (ECDD was itself a refrito). (EnochBethany (talk) 02:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC))Reply

As I have understood the actress Aracely Arambula would play but is not sure what circulates on Internet social networks and the novel would be released for the 2014 season, here you can read a little, in Spanish: [1] , [2] , The novel if it is safe to be released. --Pichu How can I help? 02:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aracely Arambula will not be in this telenovela. Last week she presented in France her new telenovela for the next year and it is Los Miserables. The protagonist of this telenovela is still unknown. Mickie777 (talk) 00:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sure you're right, but as it is novel will be released later (Marido en Alquiler) and (Les Miserables) will be released later in 2014, equal to (Lost Souls). anyway have to wait.--Pichu How can I help? 00:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Today started pre production of Los Miserables, Aracely tweeted about it. As telenovela takes various months to film and after them actors usually want to take a brake, I'm sure that the protagonist of Almas perdidas will be someone else.Mickie777 (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This Telenovela Does Not Exist

edit

I have deleted the paragraph which speaks of this telenovela as already produced. As yet it does not exist. These matters are very uncertain. That paragraph also had not citation whatsoever. I have replaced it with one that has a citation & reflects the uncertainty of this telenovela. Kindly refrain from edit-warring and insisting on speculation that has no citation. (EnochBethany (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC))Reply

I reverted your edit, if you put references may be able to stay, but the soap if there is just a remake. If you find some reference that proves that there is soap opera remake, maybe the item is proposed to delete .--Pichu How can I help? 15:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on En otra piel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply