Talk:Partner-assisted reproduction
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Reciprocal IVF page were merged into Partner-assisted reproduction on 30 June 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kahebert, 000cj000.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Merge discussion
editNewly-created student project article Reciprocal IVF duplicates this topic, so the content should be merged into this existing article to preserve the edit history. If only people would check all likely versions of a title before creating an article - they would have found the incoming redirect from Reception of Oocytes from Partner. That said, there was no entry at the ROPA disambiguation page until I added it just now. All in all, we only need one article on this topic, so the new content needs to be added to this one. I've made redirects, targetted to this article, from all the various alternative terms I found in the two articles and their refs. PamD 08:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
highest chance, lower risk?...
editAccording to the article: "Reciprocal IVF offers the highest chance for pregnancy and a lower risk of a multiple birth." A citation is given, but the link is dead...
If this is to remain in the article, I think more clarification is needed. Is it saying there's a higher chance of pregnancy relative to intravaginal or intrauterine fertilization, or relative to IVF using one's own eggs?...In any event, a working citation is needed too.
I'm also gonna go ahead and change "risk" to the more neutral "chance," since multiple births are necessarily a negative - some women even prefer them. -2003:CA:8702:8AD9:23AA:ADC1:E6FD:C898 (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)