Talk:Parvez Elahi

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Saqib in topic GA Review

DOB

edit

Hi again @Mewulwe:, what do you think which one should be correct dob? Dawn or PILDAT one? There is a big difference in birth year. --Saqib (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

1972 is impossible, must be a different person or an error in PILDAT. 1945 is correct: [1] Mewulwe (talk) 18:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Major Contradiction

edit

The List of Punjabi CM page says that Pervaiz Elahi was the 19th CM, meanwhile this page claims he was the 18th? which one is correct? Titan2456 (talk) 23:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pervaiz vs Parvez

edit

Pervaiz Elahi’s personal official Twitter and Facebook officially say that his name is spelt as Parvez, not Pervaiz. Not only that, but the Punjab Assembly and Punjab government have spelt his name as Parvez not Pervaiz, due to this I have moved the page to “Parvez Elahi”. Titan2456 (talk) 01:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Parvez Elahi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Titan2456 (talk · contribs) 02:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Saqib (talk · contribs) 13:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


I generally don’t write GA reviews, but I felt compelled to share my 2cents on this BLP. Honestly, it’s far from reaching GA status. GA articles are typically broad in their coverage, but this one is lacking. For example, it includes only a single paragraph about his five-year tenure as Chief Minister of Punjab and doesn’t address his role as President of PTI. Additionally, his term as Deputy PM is missing details about his performance or actions during that time. The BLP also neglects his service as Federal and Provincial Minister in various ministries and fails to document his performance. Furthermore, it lacks information on the numerous corruption allegations and charges against Elahi. And some paragraphs are not sourced at all, which means they contain W:OR

Please avoid nominating such BLPs for GA unless they are thoroughly prepared and near ready for such a status. Overall, this BLP is an incomplete BLP of one of Pakistan’s prominent politicians.--— Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply