Talk:Patrick Hughes (artist)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Patrick Hughes (artist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Patrick Hughes be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in London may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Patrick Hughes
editDear Administrators,
please reconsider before deleting this page.
Patrick Hughes is an artist of renown.
He has works on show at The British Library, London; Glasgow Museum and Art Gallery; the Kunsthalle Wurth; the Camera Obscura at Edinburgh. Hughes works are owned by people like Oprah Winfrey, chess Grandmaster Ray Keene, Glenn Close, Derren Brown, and Christy Hefner
His work is of scientific merit, according to psychologist Thomas Papathomas of Rutger's University's Laboratory of Vision Research and Nicholas Wade of Dundee University, who mentions Hughes in his own university webpage under research interests.
Hughes' work also featured in the June 2007 issue of Brain Research, where Takefumi Hayashi, Chie Umeda and Norman Cook of the university of Kansai reported 'an fMRI study of reverse perspective illusion'
The Tate Gallery has four Hughes works Tate page on Hughes
recent press articles about Hughes include Andrew Barrow in the Independent Barbara MacAdam in ARTnews
Hughes features in other wikipedia pages, like Anthony Earnshaw's
Heartfield01 (talk) 13:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Glad to see it so radically improved from it's earliest drafts. If the article had this info when I first looked at it, it wouldn't have been tagged. If you create other pages in the future, I'd suggest you show the aspects of renown and notability from the beginning to avoid this kind of situation again. Cheers! Pairadox (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no doubt he is a notable artist. He was on my "to do" list in fact. Good to see the article up. Tyrenius (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Tyrenius, many thanks for excellent editing. I changed Ionesco link back to Eugen Ionesco because that goes direct to the absurdist playwright - please feel free to alter if that is wrong. Will get you the statement re. public domain on the patrickhughes website, which does not move quite as quickly as wikipedia.
- Heartfield01 (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no doubt he is a notable artist. He was on my "to do" list in fact. Good to see the article up. Tyrenius (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks on both counts. It is a precaution to protect the artist, as images are often uploaded under false licences (I'm not suggesting that is the case here). An alternative validation method would be an email from the address on the Patrick Hughes site to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org confirming the images are legitimately released with the relevant licence; links to the image pages should be included in the email, and a link to the PH site contact page. The Ionesco change is correct; I've piped it to keep the previous text. I've uploaded a diagram of Vanishing Venice: you might be able to confirm if it is correct.
- The article can be considerably expanded, if you have time and inclination. The main points to remember are state facts and reference them, avoid praise, generalisations and personal knowledge. Any analysis or evaluation should only be derived from published sources and again referenced. More images are welcome and can be put in a gallery also, as in Matisse#Gallery. Model articles can be seen at WP:FA.
- Hail Tyrenius. You should have the confirmation emailed to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org as you requested now. Heartfield01 (talk) 14:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Images
editCould not find either OTRS ticket or anything about the files on Hughes' website, have emailed Hughes requesting clarification. Paradoctor (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- Have received permission from Hughes, will now go about getting it to the proper place. Paradoctor (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Done
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Patrick Hughes (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101224165308/http://www.flowersgalleries.com:80/publications/3840-perverspective/ to http://www.flowersgalleries.com/publications/3840-perverspective/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)