Talk:Patrick J. O'Connor
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Patrick J. O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221005343/http://www.elections.state.il.us/ to http://www.elections.state.il.us/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Patrick J. O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123044414/http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1363526,CST-NWS-cong06.article to http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/1363526,CST-NWS-cong06.article
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718213202/http://www.elections.state.il.us/CampaignDisclosure/CommitteeDetail.aspx?id=832 to http://www.elections.state.il.us/CampaignDisclosure/CommitteeDetail.aspx?id=832
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Tone, emphasis, and use of Wikipedia's voice
editI think the article could use work on overall tone, emphasis, and how Wikipedia's voice is used. --Hipal (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- I completely agree. This feels much more like a hit piece then a page of encyclopedic value. This is properly sourced, but it just has a really negative tone. Lectrician2 (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Better references would help. Not that the Chicago Trib isn't reliable (I assume it's being properly used and none of the refs are opinion pieces, primary sources, or other references that would cause BLP problems), but that a more independent source than the local newspaper would help. --Hipal (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think that caring chicagoan is a fake account, this is his first contribution. Lectrician2 (talk) 21:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Better references would help. Not that the Chicago Trib isn't reliable (I assume it's being properly used and none of the refs are opinion pieces, primary sources, or other references that would cause BLP problems), but that a more independent source than the local newspaper would help. --Hipal (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)