Talk:Patron saints of ailments, illness, and dangers

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Snowgrouse in topic Is this the best format?

Mycoses

edit

Anyone out there for fungal infections? Anyone?? Aadieu (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Patron saints of ailments, illness, and dangers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Is this the best format?

edit

If someone were looking to find what patronages are ascribed to a particular saint, they would go to the individual's article. If someone if looking to find which saint was/is invoked regarding a particular condition they have to scroll the entire list and hope they don't miss it. Since the page concerns "ailments, illness, and dangers' shouldn't it be these that are listed alphabetically? Mannanan51 (talk) 00:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's the same thing I was wondering about. I suppose it's slightly less unwieldy this way, because so many saints are patrons of several ailments at the same time. But I, too, would prefer a list according to ailments instead.Snowgrouse (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 11 external links on Patron saints of ailments, illness, and dangers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply