Talk:Paul Dorian
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Against speedy Deletion
editThis article doesn't deserve to be deleted under speedy deletion or any kind of deletion it is notable... check the sources.
- it was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UIS (company). Mtking (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
The article before was questioned about notability so I did the leg work and got more, but I'm starting to think that it might be more than one Paul Dorian. In any case this Paul Dorian is a notable doctor that has been published in many many places and has authored a few works. I see overlap because he also lived in California. I'm working on it... but in any case the doctor is good. And the UIS stuff is being placed on related articles.NanaRobins (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Administrators please be aware that there is an ongoing sockpuppet investigation into both User:Rainman64 and User:NanaRobins at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rainman64. Mtking (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
There is something because you are trying to make it something. Honestly I don't get why you are not looking at the work? I'm not this rainman and I really don't appreciate being harassed for trying to cleanup this mess...NanaRobins (talk) 12:57, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted because... It is a notable article that has many many reliable sources to back it up --NanaRobins (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)