This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Paul Greenfield is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because he is the highest ranking person (equivalent to CEO) in an organisation which employes > 5000 staff and has > 40,000 students. Arguably, he is the most important person in the University of Queensland. — Nerd.muncher (talk) 02:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Not trying to get involved with the deletion discussion, but this article need sections, and i think the notes section would be more appropriate as "references".GarbledLecture933 (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
