Talk:Paul Lorenzen

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Logic / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Logic
	Contemporary philosophy

took an early interpretation? instate?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't understand this sentence; I can't even parse it:

"Lorenzen took an early interpretation of Steven Weinberg (Gravitation and Cosmology, 1972) for his doubts about geometrical elements of general relativity, believing that Maxwell's equations are to be modified by general relativity instate."

What does it mean to "take an interpretation"? Whose doubts (Lorenzen's or Weinberg's)? What does "instate" mean -- should it be "instead"?

An earlier version was:

"Lorenzen followed Dingler in having doubts about geometrical elements of general relativity, believing that interpretation of Maxwell's equations are to be modified instate."

That suggests the doubts were Lorenzen's; but took an early interpretation? instate? 66.245.43.17 (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Factual problem?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"He created and modified constructive mathematics."

The word "create" is certainly inappropriate, given the many historical precedents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.65.125 (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Lorenzen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060320163246/http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/REL?PPN=11857437X to http://dispatch.opac.ddb.de/DB=4.1/REL?PPN=11857437X

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic