Talk:Paul Walsh

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tomandjerry211 (alt) in topic GA Review

POV tag

edit

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

England Deselection

edit

I remember Paul Walsh being dropped from England because he had to attend the funeral of his mother. Any more background on this would be good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.58.66.194 (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, it was because he dropped out of the under-21 squad for the Euro final.--EchetusXe 16:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Paul Walsh/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'll be review this article. Here are the issues:

  • "Stomach injury" If possible, mention what happened that led to that.
Sorry it didn't say.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • "Substituted for 60 minutes". You could just write like this: "Substituted for one hour"
OK, changed that.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • "He contracted a virus...". What virus?
Again didn't specify which one, so possibly they were never sure what it was exactly or it was something obscure.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • There's a significant reliance on his autobiography. Could you possibly vary your sources?
I have found a few more sources and added them in.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • The Walsh cite is a Harv error.
How do you mean?--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Any more images?
Not of Walsh no. I could add in the FA Cup in the honours section or Bobby Robson to the international career section or something if you think that would improve the article.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • The first paragraph seems like it should be in a separate section. Also, could more info be provided about his earlier years?
I have moved it. I added a sentence another about his Londinium club. Other than that he was a typical young football who just spent his time training and relaxing at home etc.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Link pundit in lead.
Done.--EchetusXe 11:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • OK thank you for the points @Tomandjerry211 (alt):, I have responded and acted upon them.--EchetusXe 22:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • comment Just to add here, self-published sources should be used carefully. Lines currently in the article supported by his biography such as "Walsh was lucky to even make the bench", "he trained hard, ate right and acted professionally during summer 1992 to start the 1992–93 pre-season in good condition" and "He recovered to build a strong partnership with Guy Whittingham, whilst talented midfielders Alan McLoughlin and Mark Chamberlain made a highly effective four-pronged attack, and with two games to go Portsmouth were top of the table and needed only to beat struggling Sunderland to secure an automatic promotion place.", among other sentences, should be carefully re-written so as not to include so many peacock terms and avoid passing off opinion as fact. C679 13:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
His autobiography was honest and I don't think there is any bias in the article. However I take your point that those phrases could be written more neutrally and I have now done so. Thanks.--EchetusXe 14:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Walsh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply