Talk:Paul Wei

Accurate or not?

I'm not sure if the concensus at wikipedia is to take miraculous intervention/events 'factually' or with a pinch of salt, so I've put up an

{{accuracy}}

tag. -Hmib 03:58, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Of course its accurate. -- 216.165.243.123 (unsigned user), 05:39, 13 January 2006

You have thousands of pages left to label then because religion and religious figures are usually associted with the miraculous. You have quite a job ahead of you so keep on keeping on.

i agree with the above

When the article states how a voice spoke to him it seems POV of the religion, try something like he claimed, the church believes. I dunno BauerPower 01:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The information was based upon historical church records. (written in Mandarin) --Jose77 04:15, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

This story should not be presented like actual fact; the documents cited are unreliable sources. Church records can't be used as reference; they have not been published and have not undergone scrutiny by real historians. And real history books present religious stories in the context that it is what the followers of a religion/sect believed occurred,but did not necessarily (and most probably in this case) happen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulio2008 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

To the person(s) who tagged the article with the {{story}} and {{disputed}} templates, please specify on this talk page which parts you are referring to. In this way, other users would be able to fix it more easily.

Thankyou. --Phillip J (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

POV

I feel that the POV of this article is problematic, aside from the source of the info being potentially dubious? The article should be rewritten in such a way as to indicate that Wei allegedly had some of these things happen, such as miracles et al. - Erin Andy (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)