 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editThis entry plagiarizes heavily from the "Remembering Paul Ziff" essay on the UNC Chapel Hill web site.
- As I put it in my review in Metaphilosophy,: is this part of it? Andres (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Overly positive
editThis article is good though it includes too many sentences that are overly positive and value-judging. Example "Jonathan Cohen said, back in the early 60s, the last chapter "is one of the best discussions of the word 'good' that has ever been published". It still is, forty years later.". Deleet (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Mh. No description of his actual ideas, views or arguments, just talk about the external. Andres (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Incomplete
editPaul Ziff's last book 'Moralities' is not listed. It was released posthumously in 2004 by Springer (formerly Reidel and Kluwer Academic Publishers, now Springer Nature); see: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-0500-4. 81.205.153.24 (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)