Talk:Paul van Dyk

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MysteryBE in topic Pronounciation

Co-Productions

edit

This discography no longer has co-productions. Should this be included back in the main article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBurmanator (talkcontribs) 15:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

update: I reverted the discography page to bring back the co-productions section. however I think there should be a separate related artists block aside from those co-produced with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBurmanator (talkcontribs) 19:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Instruments

edit

I wasn't entirely sure what to put under Instruments in the infobox, so if someone could fix that...? ~Kaiti~ 05:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pronounciation

edit

Can someone please tell me how to pronounce "Dyk" ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Randyrusli (talkcontribs) 14:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Yeah, sure, I don't understand the phoenetic alphabet but it's pronounced like "duke"... more or less =P kaiti-sicle 19:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I am very certain it's pronounced as "Dyke".--M1xmast3r 23:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Are you? Listen to him say it. Sounds closer to "duke" to me when he says it! kaiti-sicle 11:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
no as he sais Belgian namd, Im Belgian, its pronounced like DIJK in Dutch, but you don't have that in English, or maybe like HEY without the H, D-EY-K and K like in book MysteryBE (talk) 03:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

On his website there is a interview and the moderator introduces him as paul van dyk and pronounced the dyk like in german "dück" which is I think not possible to write in english. Look up how to pronounce the Umlaut "Ü". greets --84.159.10.88 00:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

That's a better explanation. I was trying to compare it to something in English, but it just ... doesn't work. =p kaiti-sicle 20:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Listen to Paul himself say it in this video, http://youtube.com/watch?v=BtfFlT0fb68 he says Dyke... but now that I think of it he might have just said it that way cause there are a lot of people that think that's pronounced that way. Including me lol. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M1xmast3r (talkcontribs) 18:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC).Reply
Yeah, I think he does do that =P I've noticed he says it different when he's with English-speakers compared to Germans... It makes sense what you say ^^ kaiti-sicle 19:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

national (germany): dük international: dyke --84.159.59.104 22:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


I have heard his "Ministry of Sound" recording. In that, He calls himself as Dyk (pronounced as 'DYKE'). So I guess that is it. He would know better than anyone else :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.12.231 (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Formally" a trance producer...

edit

I have reverted edits by Gouryella on several grounds, but felt it imprudent to continue to do so without discussing the reasons here, so that if anyone disagrees, they might voice their opinion.

  • Removing image released under the GNU Free Documentation License, and adding following invisible comment: Please quit changing it, the other picture was so lame, this is a "professional" shot of Paul van Dyk.
    The image is free use, and so I see no problem with keeping it. The comment belongs on the talk page, if anywhere, and makes reference to a previous image but does not identify or re-add it.
  • Striking out "previous" genres in the musician infobox.
    Inconsistent with other infoboxes. Striking out in articles should generally be avoided, in my opinion. However, I'm unable to find any style guide or policy which mentions striking out, so this might be a point which others disagree on.
  • Changing Was a trance producer in the early 1990's... to Was formally a trance producer in the early 1990's...
    Seems unnecessary to me. I imagine that the reference to an earlier decade would indicate this anyway; furthermore, while van Dyk himself no longer defines his music as trance, this doesn't mean that his is a universally accepted viewpoint.

Any thoughts on the above would be welcome. haz (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Formerly, not formally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salamibears58 (talkcontribs) 03:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

Any info about his birth name? Why does he go by van Dyk and not Matthias?

Name

edit

His real name is Matthias Paul, not Paul Matthias. The source linked to his name lists last names first, that's why it reads Paul Matthias

Defaultsort

edit

Should it be Dyk, Paul van rather than Van Dyk, Paul? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:2B0:305A:20:9952:4BEE:58BB:BDBB (talk) 08:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paul van Dyk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

MixMag is NOT a source

edit

I already removed it once and the page is now semi-protected. The source re: his fall is not actually a source. It implies rumors are facts, especially considering his head injury, which according to the source, is from "discussions on Twitter report a head injury". Having been to the event I can clarify that no one officially confirmed this and it's not any more valid than my "Original Research". It needs to be removed because it's a terrible source. Geokoder (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Politics of Dancing 3

edit

The Politics of Dancing 3 is a studio album. It's not a DJ mix or a compilation album unlike its predecessors The Politics of Dancing and The Politics of Dancing 2. Don't remove it from the discography section.[1]Zawl 07:55, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Paul van Dyk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply