Talk:Pavao Žanić

Discussion as of 4/27/21

Question for Governor Sheng - why did you place a reference written by Zanic and then change the author to Vukšić [1] Also on worldcat it shows Zanic as being the author [2] Red Rose 13 (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Because he's not the author of that particular chapter. He can be considred an author, because the book is his collected work, however, everything else was written by Vukšić. It's rather co-authorship of the two [3]. --Governor Sheng (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Actually Zanic was the author and Vuksic was the editor so it is correct to put Zanic as the author. See here:[[4]] and scroll down to the list of books he edited.Red Rose 13 (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please, stop with your disruptive editing. You don't have the damn book. Or you're silly enough to think that Žanić himself wrote that he was a talented and intelligent kid? Get yourself together. --Governor Sheng (talk) 22:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Clearly you did not follow the LINK I POSTED ABOVE BUT HERE IT IS AGAIN. [[5]] Zanic was the author and Vuksic was the editor. Most books have editors you know.Red Rose 13 (talk) 02:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

SCROLL DOWN TO THIS

Knjige koje je uredio:

– Istina oslobađa. Zbornik biskupa Pavla Žanića, Mostar 1991.;

...Sigh..., an editor cannot write a chapter in the book? And no, I didn't follow the link you showed. I don't care. --Governor Sheng (talk) 18:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Then you will need to provide proof from a respected source.Red Rose 13 (talk) 21:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

I won't. You'll trust me on this. --Governor Sheng (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

I found the proof from a respected source. Vukšić was the editor of this book - just scroll down to the words: Knjige koje je uredio or in English The books he edited - and this book is the first one listed. Please note that on the same page are books where he was the author but in this book he is the editor only = Archdiocese.[[6]] and also here from University of Sarajevo - Catholic Faculty of Theology [[7]] Also The correct way to do this on Wikipedia would be to place Zanic as the author and Vukšić as the editor. You can fix it or I will need to.Red Rose 13 (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

You're unbearable. I know he is the editor, but he is also the author of this short chapter of the book which describes Žanić's bio. And no, that is not the correct way of doing it. Think better. P. S. Interesting how Kutleša will become archbishop of Split and Vukšić will become the archbishop of Vrhbosna, ie, a chief bishop in Bosnia and Herzegovina... Blows my mind. --Governor Sheng (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

But you are missing a very important point. Zanic is the author and Vuksic is the editor. That's it! That needs to be placed up front. Plus you need to provide proof he wrote the chapter himself. So far he has said he was the editor of the book and never that he wrote a chapter. Please correct it. Why are you so resistant in posting it correctly?.Red Rose 13 (talk) 23:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop making up the rules. Buy the book. --Governor Sheng (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Reference Issues

Governor Sheng please fix these reference problems Reference - 2, 5 , 34 – all three are dead end and some are used more than once.Red Rose 13 (talk) 00:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

You can fix 2 and 5. Can't do it without me? Governor Sheng (talk) 00:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I am spending my time going through all the pages finding the problems but I don't know how to fix these. They are not sources I added. Did you add these? or did someone else?Red Rose 13 (talk) 06:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Lol, so you reporting me backfired, and now you're playing a saint again. Like I said, I'm too old for that. Governor Sheng (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)