Talk:Pazmiño

Pazmiño: Proposing article for deletion per WP:PROD. (TW)

Dear JamesBWatson (talk)‎, I noticed you proposed deletion of the article Pazmiño. I'm not quite sure as to why you proposed the deletion. It is, like a great many other articles on wikipedia, an article of anthroponym. Such articles include Johnson, Bettencourt, Smith, and hundreds of other articles, all of which are historically "notable", no more and no less "notable" than the other.

It is my arguemnt that the history of the Pazmiño clan and lineage is of historical notability, relating to the history of notable Ecuadorian conquistadors, founders of cities, and their place in society in the past and present

The article lists the history of the clan, and then also serves as a page listing the many prominant people of that lineage, which is what every other similar page does. My argument is that if it is deleted, then every other article of the same nature should be deleted to. The Pazmiño article, however, is one of historical notability, at par with every other anthroponymic articles which rightfully exist on Wikipedia.

Please reconsider your proposition for its delition.

Pazmiño (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

The deletion of theologians, academics and church leaders indicates a political and religious bias in the editorial process and the earlier edition should be restored. 96.237.137.108 (talk) 10:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)