Talk:Peanut butter
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peanut butter article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Artisan peanut butter page were merged into Peanut butter on April 21 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Possible edit to Trivia section
editThe reference to the FDA allowing up to 2 rodent hairs per 100g of peanut butter is contradicted by the FDA's own website: http://www.fda.gov/ora/compliance_ref/cpg/cpgfod/cpg570-300.html. The citation link that is there is broken and the website it leads to is not cited and is amateurish.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.240.19.202 (talk) 06:56, 29 January 2007
Hyperlink needed: Western Health Reform Institute
editWestern Health is the formal name for what became Battle Creek Sanitarium
Source: Group that currently owns the building has confirmed. https://car.libraryhost.com/agents/corporate_entities/281 EuphoricDoric (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Already done. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 11:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a simple spelling mistake under the "History" section, where it says "John Harvey Kellogg's Battle Creek Sanatorium" it should actually be "Sanatarium". 2600:1016:B00D:6AE4:0:4B:4C46:E401 (talk) 08:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Done "Sanitarium". Hyphenation Expert (talk) 11:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Nutritional Value
editThe article mentions that it has high protien value, but seems to neglect that fact that it is higher in fats. Maybe a possible change. 129.97.124.80 (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)