Talk:Pearson language tests
Latest comment: 11 years ago by ChrisGualtieri in topic Contested deletion
 | PTE Young Learners was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| PTE General was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Pearson Test of English Academic was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Notable, wide use, many sources on the international level. Added highbeam one from the beginning of its use. This is unquestionably notable for GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I agree that this is notable and has enough sources to establish notability. The next deletion attempt, if necessary, should happen at AfD. - tucoxn\talk 01:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've put the three other pages on the individual tests up for deletion after merging in much of the content. This will balance it out for now and since the Business unit is notable, its products 'the tests' should be covered here as usual. While it is a naming nightmare, this page is much better now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)