Talk:Pee (South Park)

Image proposal

Noticed the pipe link to Silver Spring monkeys and noticed this image. Might want to consider using this image in the article once/if the article is expanded to include sourced material related to this matter. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pee (South Park)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hunter, I'll be reviewing this article. As with all my reviews, I'm going to do this one haphazardly :) JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

1. The entire plot section is not referenced. Not sure if this is a problem.
   • I know you know this now, but WP:TVMOS doesn't require citations for plot summaries. — Hunter Kahn 01:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
2. The word 'pee' is used seven times in the plot section (excluding direct quotes). I don't really think that's necessary - shouldn't it be replaced with a more neutral term? 'Pee' is somewhat of a dysphemism in the mildest sense.
   • I changed most of them to urine. Is this acceptable? — Hunter Kahn 01:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Personally, I think it is. But...since the name of the episode itself is "Pee", should it be mentioned in the article somewhere at least once to explain the it's a slang word for "urine", even though it's common knowledge and fairly deducible? - SoSaysChappy (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

1. Apparently, "There should not be anything in the lead not mentioned in the rest of the article". I know it's minor, but the bit about the original UK broadcast date doesn't show up anywhere in the article. This isn't too important so if you can't fit it in it doesn't really matter.
   • Actually, this has come up at other episode GANs, and I hadn't been able to find sources for the UK dates (which were added by other people, not me). I dropped it from those articles, and I've now dropped it from this one. — Hunter Kahn 01:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

So for the time being, this article is on hold. It shouldn't take too long to fix this up so I await your reply :) JulieSpaulding (talk) 10:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   JulieSpaulding (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Water World

There should be a mention of the real world Water World park in Denver, which this is likely based on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.145.127.182 (talk) 23:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pee (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u4nhxbFC?url=http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/19/wednesday-broadcast-cable-finals-glee-americas-next-top-model-tick-up/34157 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/19/wednesday-broadcast-cable-finals-glee-americas-next-top-model-tick-up/34157

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pee (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5u4ozvGBc?url=http://tv.ign.com/articles/961/961804p1.html to http://tv.ign.com/articles/961/961804p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)