Talk:Peggy Siegal
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Katine67 in topic Re: nomination for deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Re: nomination for deletion
editThis subject seems notable as referenced by several articles in noteworthy publications. Connection to one or more of the infamouse "Me Too" movement male characters (Jeffrey Espstein) and fallout thereof seems notable, no? K67 (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- I thought it was when I created it, but now I kind of see what this editor means. I tried to expand it, but there wasn't really much to add. So I'm neutral on whether it should be kept. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 21:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
I think that the Epstein stuff/me too movement and it's fallout supports notability. Other than that, there isn't much that a normal publicist couldn't say. K67 (talk) 22:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)