Talk:Pelvic inflammatory disease/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 17:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pending
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Pending
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Source

The statement: "Other complications include: endometritis, salpingitis, tubo-ovarian abscess, pelvic peritonitis, periappendicitis, and perihepatitis," is supported by the Sternak reference. @Doc James: I am questioning the removal of this reference after the statement. Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

• • On that point, I have added the Sternak ref to the end for clarity. BTW, I'm putting this on hold.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Few more:

• Fix dashes using a script
• Inconsistency: "%" and "percent"
• numbers less than 10 are written as words per MOS:NUM--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 17:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

I have corrected the inconsistency regarding the percentage and I have edited so that numbers less than ten are spelled out. I regret that I don't have any idea on how to use a script to correct dashes. Is this something I should ask the Copy editors guild?

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I have requested the help of another editor who I hope will help resolve the dash/script issue.

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Passing, well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)