Talk:Pemoline
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pemoline article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pemoline.
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow... somebody messed up. They placed a link on this page linking to the "official site" of Pemoline. Pemoline is a generic name for a drug.... how can an "offical" site exist? That's like the "Official site" of A.S.A., it makes no sense. (Even if they register a clever domain!) I have to wonder what information they provide when they make a claim like that. I replaced the link with a link to the product monograph. -WH
I wanted to point out, in the article it says it does not cause the loss of appetite that other stimulants do? Well, I took Pemoline from 6 years of age up until 13, and besides putting me in the hurt bag psycologically (which is why I am against giving these drugs to children now), it almost completely suppressed my appetite. In fact, up until I stopped taking it, I was relatively thin. After I ceased taking it, I gained almost 200 pounds over the course of about 3 years and also started to struggle with depression disorders and other mental health disturbances. The fact that a doctor could still find a way to circumvent the FDA recommendation that it not be prescribed on 'sympathetic grounds' is not only appalling, but baffling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.156.69 (talk) 02:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pemoline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051205125434/http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/list/green.pdf to http://www.incb.org/pdf/e/list/green.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
No direct evidence for releasing agent activity?
editHello,
I've been trying to verify the claim that pemoline is a releasing agent of dopamine. While I see that this is clearly mentioned in the provided secondary source, the primary source it cites (Iijima 1986) does not make this claim. Furthermore, the actual published FDA pamphlet (FDA 2002) states that pemoline's MOA with regards to dopamine has not been elucidated.
If someone has an original source demonstrating releasing-agent activity, please let me know. At the moment I'm inclined to believe that this is pharmacological hearsay from a time when psychopharmacology was less mature and people were more eager to state mechanistic inferences as fact in their research. Oro Temp (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)