Talk:PennPraxis

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GenZenny in topic Not Split into Different Sections


I think that PennPraxis has become notable because it is starting to influence city planning and design. Please offer opinions for or against here. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on PennPraxis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Not Split into Different Sections

edit

The article is just one big piece which can make it hard for people to find the information they need. It also doesn't have much content. Article needs to be divided into different sections so it is easy for readers to get just the information they want and/or need. GenZenny (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply