Talk:Pennsylvania Station (1910–1963)/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 16:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

As far as sourcing goes, is measuringworth reliable? How about hiddennj? Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
epicgenius: I'm slightly confused about WP:NPOV, in phrases like "that could somehow atone for the loss of an architectural treasure." placing on hold for these two minor problems. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Eddie891: Thanks for the review. I just got back from a Labor Day vacation so I'm pretty busy right now, but I'll address these soon. epicgenius (talk) 13:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- @Eddie891: I've looked over the article and removed some of the POV phrases. As for sources, I've removed the HiddenNJ source, as it's self-published. It looks like Measuring Worth is reliable (it's just a calculator for GDP inflation, and anyway, the reference is contained within {{inflation-fn}}). epicgenius (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK. Not the longest review, but a longer review isn't necessary because I think it's a fine article. nice work. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed