| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Penruddock uprising article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Untitled
editThe discrepancy in dates mentioned in the links to the Disbrowe letters is most likely due to the fact of their pre-dating the calendar revision of 1752. At the time of the uprising, new year's day fell on 25 March (Lady Day) so 22 March 1654 as mentioned in the letters is what we would think of as 22 March 1655. David Guest 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Trials
edit@User:Svejk74 Is the source for the edit (Revision as of 12:30, 27 February 2014):
- Woolrych, Austin (1955). Penruddock's rising, 1655. Historical Association Publications General Series. Vol. 29 (revised ed.). G. Philip.
?-- PBS (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Other than the bits with specific citations I seem to remember much of it is in Ravenhill's 1875 book, i.e. for Rivers' petitions see Ravenhill, p.153 as well as the Thurloe papers, p.746Svejk74 (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Seems overly detailed for this article so I've simplified. Robinvp11 (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)