Talk:Pensacola Convoy

A fact from Pensacola Convoy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,114 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Pensacola Convoy, which in 1941 carried the first United States soldiers to be based in Australia, was planned initially to reinforce Allied forces defending the Philippines?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/February.

Wikipedia

Military history: Maritime / South Pacific / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pensacola Convoy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Operation Plum?

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Someone please explain to me how that Operation PLUM applies to the Pensacola convoy when the deployment that took place more than a month before on WINFIELD SCOTT carrying the personnel for two pursuit squadrons, a div-bomber group and an air base group were also identified as PLUM? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.222.20 (talk) 16:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Plum" was the code name for the Philippines in written communication, so that personnel could be issued travel orders without their destination being divulged. Equipment/gear being shipped also had "Plum" stenciled on it. Referring to this particular convoy as an "operation", much less "Operation Plum", does appear misleading. If necessary, it will be challenged for citation.--Reedmalloy (talk) 08:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Instead I deleted the references as trivia immaterial to the article.--Reedmalloy (talk) 10:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pensacola Convoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic