Talk:People's Party (Serbia, 2017)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 21:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 21:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Lead

• Specify that Narodna is the party's abbreviation
  •  Done
• "after the attack on" → "after an attack on", what type of attack?
  •  Done It was a physical attack.
• "With UZPS, it took part" replace "it" with Narodna
  •  Done
• "then-member" → "a then-member" or "then a member"
  •  Done

History

• Mention who Vuk Jeremić in the first sentence/his prior political background
  •  Done
• Per MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE, include the original Serbian text of "would be positioned on the centre-right on the political spectrum" immediately after it in parenthesis ("{{lang|sr|original quote}}")
  •  Done
• In the parenthesis (Narodna), specify that Narodna is the party's abbreviation
  •  Done
• Replace ", while" with a semicolon
  •  Done
• Put a semicolon after "first vice-president"
  •  Done
• Remove the comma after "realised in the City Assembly of Belgrade"
  •  Done
• "After the attack" → "After an attack", what type of attack?
  •  Done
• "National Assembly has no legitimacy" → "National Assembly had no legitimacy"
  •  Done
• Add "as" after Jeremić was re-elected
  •  Done
• "SZS was dissolved, while" → "SZS was dissolved and"
  •  Done
• Is there significance to/reason why Jovanović left Nardona?
  •  Done Yes, I've added it now. This was a significant move in the party's history.
• Add (SSP) after the first mention of the Party of Freedom and Justice
  •  Done Oops.
• "A month later, after a closed session of the party's main board, it was alleged that there was a conflict between Aleksić and Jeremić." Alleged by who?
  •  Done
• "The presidency" of Narodna?
  • Yes, predsedništvo in Serbian, a body composed of high-ranking members in the party (president, vice-presidents, etc.)
• Include original Serbian quotes for "coup d'état", "autocracy", "it would represent a conflict of interest within the party", and "frontal conflict between Jeremić and me" MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE
  •  Done

Ideology and platform

• Include original Serbian quotes for "military neutrality, independent institutions, depoliticisation of the Security Intelligence Agency, and the adoption of the law on lustration", "political revanchism towards members and helpers of Vučić", "imperialist policy in the Balkans", "slowly turning his back on Europe", "reintegration of Kosovo into the constitutional and legal order of Serbia", "we would then know who would be in the government and who would be in the opposition"
  •  Done
• Add "the" before Democratic Party of Serbia
  •  Done
• "It has been also described" by who?
  •  Done
• "remained on the sideline" reword, sounds like a MOS:EUPHEMISM
  •  Done
• "It has voiced its opposition" replace "it" with Narodna to disambiguate from all the parties mentioned prior
  •  Done
• What is the current election threshold
  •  Done 3 percent

Organisation

• "Its headquarters are" → "Its headquarters is", HQ is singular in this context
  •  Done

Electoral performance

• 2020 in Parliamentary elections and Provincial elections should have a reference that the party boycotted those elections
  •  Done
• Presidential elections should be before Parliamentary elections
  • Serbia is a parliamentary republic, so no. Parliamentary elections are far more important.

Overall

• Images properly licensed
• References seem ok
• No war edits
• Neutral
• Focused and broad

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@Vacant0: I've left comments for the review above. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 21:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

All done. Vacant0 (talk) 12:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Looks good. I'll pass this article. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 19:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing! Vacant0 (talk) 19:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)