Talk:PeopleBrowsr/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about PeopleBrowsr. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Removed text
I don't think this is relevant to the article, so I removed it:
- With such advancements in social networking, we have evolved from a society that is connected by six degrees of separation to one that is three degrees of separation.[1]
DataMine?
I see that "Data Mine" was changed to "DataMine" again. It's unclear what that means. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Sourcing -- October 2010
To add and keep content on this article requires sourcing and editing meeting WP:RS. Discuss edits and sourcing here first. Flowanda | Talk 11:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Undue promotion
This article has swung too far towards promotional fluff which should be on a company website. In an encyclopedic article, the company's "mission" is not relevant (unless reliable sources have made some point about the stated mission). What the company "believes" is likewise just marketspeak that has no place here. When I get an opportunity, I will prune the article back to something more neutral, and the result will probably be a lot shorter than the current celebration. Perhaps user Entroporium (talk · contribs) would like to begin the process? I notice that Klout has inappropriate external links in the article, and Kred Influence Measurement and ASIC v Rich and Jodee Rich are articles related to the topic of this article. Johnuniq (talk) 01:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)