This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
People Who Were Killed in Animal Attacks is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Schazjmd You didn't even read. You just edit my stuff and I had to redo it, if you read you would know the reason why, celebrities/famous people are in yellow rows, most list on wikipedia, are big, but i did make it a bit smaller.
JaneciaTaylor, per WP:FONTSIZE, Editors should avoid manually inserting large and small fonts into prose. Increased and decreased font size should primarily be produced through automated facilities such as headings or through carefully designed templates. Notable people are already indicated by wikilinks to their articles, making all of their rows yellow is redundant and overwhelming to readers. Schazjmd(talk)23:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Schazjmd Where is the article on Wikipedia that said yellow is redundant?
JaneciaTaylor, you said you're using yellow to indicate notable people and I pointed out that notable people are already indicated by their name linking to their wikipedia article. An additional method of saying the same thing is redundant. (Also, in general: on talk pages, please use proper indentation and sign your posts with ~~~~, thanks) Schazjmd(talk)23:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)Reply