Talk:Perfection (Dannii Minogue song)

Good articlePerfection (Dannii Minogue song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 17, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Track times?

edit

Does anyone know the track times for:

  1. "Perfection" (Ruff Diamond remix)
  2. "Perfection" (Seamas Haji & Emmanuel instrumental)

-- Underneath-it-All 01:27, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Dannii-Perfection.jpg

edit
 

Image:Dannii-Perfection.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

Looks pretty good! A few suggestions:

  • The article is on the short side. Hopefully some of my suggestions below can help beef it up a little bit.
  • The lead needs to be expanded a bit to summarize all the major sections.
  • UK should be spelled out the first time mentioned.
  • The AMG review kind of comes out of nowhere. Ideally, there should be a critical reception section for stuff like that. I'd also like to hear a bit more from other (perhaps less critical) critics.
  • "selling 7,717 copies." should give a time frame, I think.
  • "The the song was also successful" two "the"'s
  • The "Formats and track listings" and "Personnel" sections should use a medium dash (–) not the small dash. The External links should have a long one (I think, maybe it's medium).
  • MVDBase is not considered a reliable source.

And that's it! I've put the article on hold, which gives you 7 days. Let me know when you think you've addressed my concerns. Drewcifer (talk) 23:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think I've added your suggestions into the article. I have searched everywhere for more reviews, but can't find any. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me! Too bad about the lack of reviews, but I guess it's pretty hard to find reviews of individual songs. Anyways, good work! Drewcifer (talk) 04:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again! -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Perfection (Dannii Minogue song)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Perfection (Dannii Minogue song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ukcharts":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply