Talk:Peripartum cardiomyopathy

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Peripartum cardiomyopathy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Ref formatting

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

It might be nice to convert this to a more dynamic style of formatting for the references. As it stands, any change means manually re-numbering the references. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I will do that. --Erinmartineau (talk) 22:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Done.--Erinmartineau (talk) 15:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

By the way, reference [11] does not support things stated in text. Pulmonary emboly in the reference was wrong diagnosis, not complication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.198.108.227 (talk) 12:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review in Circulation

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020491 JFW | T@lk 15:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic