Talk:Persecution of Poles in Warmia

Untitled

I redirected information to Warmia

Nazi atrocitiest were removed from the Warmia article to an isolated obscure page, I see no reason why such information should be removed from history of Warmia, while other parts of history remain. I hope I am wrong, but this looked like an attempt to conceal certain parts of history from the reader. This was a drastic solution and shouldn't be taken without discussing this on the talk page. --Molobo 02:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

It was probably split off because the article was getting too long. There should be a link saying "See also: Nazi crimes in Warmia" on the Warmia page. Was it not there? --Rory096 02:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The disputed section had been the subject of a revert war for two weeks (without Talk discussion) and, IMO, was going into excessive depth in a breadth article. Instead of removing the information altogether as other users have done, I moved it into a new article where information about the time period can be listed in greater detail, and clearly added a link to this new article within the text of the original article. I did not initially add a link to this article in the "See also" subheader; I have now done so. Compare the edits before and after for your own opinion. Olessi 04:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

You did it without consulting the others, and I see no dispute over atrocities comitted by German state on Poles, only the attempts of some users to delete them. By removing them from article as they only in different way you made article conceal important part of the history of German-Polish relations in that region. I see no reason why this part of history should be moved to different article disappearing de facto from history of the region while other parts of history remain. --Molobo 13:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

There are no links see also Teutonic Knights in Warmia etc. Why were Nazi atrocities singled out? Also It was probably split off because the article was getting too long isn't correct, the article doesn't excede the limit of size yet. --Molobo 03:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

molobo, Cool down. A separate article is not an "obscure article". It may be linked from other places and its title gives clear idea of the topic. Also, it is convenient to put it into proper categories. mikka (t) 04:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I see no reason why this part of History of Warmia should be removed from its history while others remain. --Molobo 12:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

How about a tradeoff: put the Nazi into separate article, since this is a big piece, but expand the summary for this period? Indeed, this section for period less then 10 yeard is disproportionally large with respect to the whole long, multicentury history of Warmia. mikka (t) 17:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Article's title

I'm not sure if the title correctly reflects the content of the article. It already seems much widere than the crimes alone. Any ideas ? --Lysy^talk 08:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Merge?

Should this be merged into Nazi crimes against ethnic Poles? Olessi 19:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)