This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The following convert is currently broken because the unit is not defined (I've used l rather than liter because the former is consistent with other units):
{{convert|0.1|μg/l}} → 0.1 micrograms per litre (5.8×10−11 oz/cu in)
That unit can be added, but first please have a look at the density units listed here. The following is available:
{{convert|0.01|ug/dL}} → 0.01 micrograms per decilitre (3.6×10−12 lb/cu in)
If ug/l is wanted (the units tend to be what is easier to type, and "ug" is common, although the proper micro sign is shown in the output), what should be the default output? Johnuniq (talk) 09:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I took the measurement directly from the source. Happy to use ug and dL. If you add ug/l, then lb/cu in seems like the right output. Thanks for noticing. Lfstevens (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ideally we would find descriptions of the topic where measurements are given in imperial units, and use whatever they use. Even using oz/cuin gives a very small number: