Talk:Pete Bevacqua
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
AfC?
editIs this supposed to be an AfC submission? Adam9007 (talk) 01:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't know what AfC is
BdgroverBdgrover (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Should lede include "29,000"??
editI'm not going to get into an edit war with an IP over this. The IP has inserted the 29000 into this phrase in the lede "serving the association's 29,000 PGA Professionals." numerous times over the past couple times. I don not believe the number is of any use nor does it belong in Pete's article. The PGA will grow or shrink, the current large number to me seems promotional. It does not add in any way shape or form except to make Pete look powerful and successful. Communicate, IP, or I will file a request for consensus and or seek action against your edit warring. Thanks, L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 15:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)