Talk:Pete Buttigieg 2020 presidential campaign
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MrX in topic Discussion at talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Two part RfC about inclusion criteria for listing candidates in infoboxes
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pete Buttigieg 2020 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Hampshire polling
edit@Gleeanon409: the reason I reverted your edit is because it's outdated. As you can see here, Buttigieg is polling in the 20% range. I don't necessarily think we should add it to the article, since the primary results should be available about a day from now. - MrX 🖋 00:00, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- It’s serving as a placeholder if nothing else, and will quickly be updated with election results. If you can wait a few minutes I’m working on Nevada, then a sentence about Super Tuesday which should help tie in the context.
- BTW, I think we should get rid of all the Shadow content, it feels Undue, any thoughts? Gleeanon409 (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- OK. I don't have much of an opinion about the Shadow material. No objection if you think it should be removed. - MrX 🖋 00:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Discussion at talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Two part RfC about inclusion criteria for listing candidates in infoboxes
edit
You are invited to join the discussion at talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries#Two part RfC about inclusion criteria for listing candidates in infoboxes. - MrX 🖋 02:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)