Talk:Pete Hawkes
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Neutrality and edit warring
editHi User:Mcmatter, User:Johnlesslie and User:Kane11119,
I arrived at this article while cleaning up spam and vandalism added by one or more paid editors, and I'm certainly not biased towards or against the subject of this article.
I see that you have been editing back and forth. If you get stuck on a point, please involve other editors. For example, you could go to WP:WikiProject Jazz or the Music genres task force for second and third opinions.
I've tried to remove content that is not consistent with an unbiased, non-promotional encyclopedia article. All assertions, especially in biographical articles, need to be backed up in reliable, unbiased sources. Also, note that we don't have to cover every review and performance of an artist in a general-purpose encyclopedia. In other words, verifiability doesn't guarantee inclusion.
I think that the article is now in significantly better shape than it was a while back, and I'm sure we can work together to make sure it only gets better, not worse. --Slashme (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Slashme: Thank you for your help. This current round of socks has been blocked for the time being. Your version looks very similar to one I had left before going to bed. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Mcmatter: Glad to help! --Slashme (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Conflict of interest?
editThis article has been created and maintained by a series of single purpose accounts, a number of which have similar user names, which appears to suggest either the same or similar people using multiple accounts and/or conflict of interest editing. It would be good if these editors could clarify their relationships to one another and to the subject of this article. Until then, I have restored the Conflict of Interest query on the article. Melcous (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Request edit on 23 July 2021
edit | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard. |
- What I think should be changed: simply gramar changes??? nothing at all with content?
- Why it should be changed:
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
Mysteriousmusicman (talk) 08:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
References
Not done no specific edit requested. Theroadislong (talk) 08:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
