Talk:Peter Alexander (artist)
 | A news item involving Peter Alexander (artist) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 May 2020. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproven notability
editI don't see evidence of this subject's notability in the current content. As it stands I think it is a likely candidate to be nominated for potential deletion. Any views? Peteinterpol (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, there's nothing here to even make a judgement. tedder (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Photograph
editIt is good to have a photograph but does anyone out there have one that is better than this? It's not even a clear shot of his face and we just have to take the photographer's word that it is him! Peteinterpol (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Alexander (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101101043830/http://isherwoodfoundation.org/advisory_board.htm to http://www.isherwoodfoundation.org/advisory_board.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Once again
editAs mentioned almost 8 years ago the pic in the infobox is next to useless. You cant see the artist at all. Even when you click on the pic to go to its file page the only thing you can see is some white hair and an eyebrow. It fails almost every guideline for a pic to be used in an article. OTOH since yjr asrticle did get traffic with its main page mention perhaps no readers were bothered by its lack of usefulness. MarnetteD|Talk 05:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)