Talk:Peter Dean (artist)

Latest comment: 9 days ago by FineArtFanatic in topic Unreliable sources tag
WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 10 July 2024 by reviewer MarcGarver (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconArts Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Unreliable sources tag

edit

Hi @Youknowwhoistheman. Would you be able to indentify which sources you think are unreliable on the page? FineArtFanatic (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey @FineArtFanatic, Thank you for your contributions.
Here are your three unreliable sources (WP:RS). The first references are from Metro, in WP:RSP Metro is generally unreliable (for more info please see WP:METRO). your second source from Vimeo, this ref also is non reliable source. and your third ref from DailyMail, so according to WP:RSP, DailyMail is also non reliable website. Thank You! Cheers and Happy editing. Youknow? (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much. I’ll search for more reliable references for the first two. The third though is an article written by Hawking himself for publication exclusively in the Daily Mail and therefore it is the only available reference. So I would argue that, in this context, it should be seen as a reliable source (even though I can understand why the Daily Mail would ordinarily be deemed unreliable). FineArtFanatic (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply