Talk:Peter Dicken

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Multinational corporation#Transnational Corporations|transnational corporations]] The anchor (#Transnational Corporations) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Reference dispute and notability

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The lead of this article claims notability because of the subject's book, "Global Shift." I've done some searching and can only just barely find the book on amazon.com at all. The paperback is rated 615,458 while the hardcover is rated 2,644,134. I'm also unable to find where Amazon has an Economic Geography section at all.

I did find a listing for Global Shift at the British Library which could prove the book to be notable under WP:N. Although the book may be notable, this doesn't prove an author to be notable per WP:CREATIVE.

I'm marking this page for speedy deletion.OlYeller^Talktome 09:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

You may find the fact that the author and book are British, that it could have been an idea to check the Amazon.co.uk site, at which it is ranked at 67,222, considerably higher than previous estimates. Also, if you simply type "World Economy" into Google Scholar, this results in Peter Dicken's work being the 6th result, with over 1000 citations. Does this not show a higher level of importance than previously thought? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.88.162.166 (talk) 04:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ya, we figured out that he was important about a week ago. Thanks for keeping me honest though. OlYeller^Talktome 04:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic